Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40754950›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2026

Divergent evolutionary trajectories of male and female investment in the Brassicaceae.

Mohammadjavad Haghighatnia, Marek Svitok, Marcus A Koch, Roswitha Schmickl, Clément Lafon Placette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammadjavad HaghighatniaDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague CZ-128 01, Czech Republic.
Marek SvitokDepartment of Biology and General Ecology, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen 960 01, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-2710-8102
Marcus A KochDepartment of Biodiversity and Plant Systematics, Centre for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Roswitha SchmicklDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague CZ-128 01, Czech Republic.
Clément Lafon PlacetteDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague CZ-128 01, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6634-8104

Funding

Charles University Research Centre programme PRIMUS/19/SCI/02Czech Academy of Sciences RVO 67985939e-INFRA CZ project ID:90254ERDF ITMS313011T721Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech RepublicOperational Program Integrated Infrastructure
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPlants have colonized diverse habitats, with their ecological success depending on key adaptive traits. Among these, reproductive characteristics such as pollen and ovule production are critical. The allocation to sexual reproduction is likely shaped by diverse selective pressures and constraints. This study investigates the evolution of pollen and ovule production and its drivers in the Brassicaceae family.

methodsWe analysed 158 Brassicaceae species, recorded pollen and ovule numbers, and used phylogenetic analyses to characterize the evolution of these traits. We then cultivated a subset of 66 species in a common garden and tested the association of pollen and ovule production with environmental conditions of original habitats. KEY RESULTS AND

conclusionsOvule production is strongly constrained by phylogeny, whereas pollen production is more evolutionarily flexible. Expectedly, recurrent mating system shifts played a role in this observation, as selfing species consistently produced fewer pollen grains but did not show significant changes in ovule number, supporting selection for reduced male investment in response to increased mating efficiency. In contrast, environmental associations with both traits were limited yet significant, with pollen and ovule production evolving according to different environmental pressures. Polyploidy did not influence the evolution of these traits. These phylogeny-informed findings refine our understanding of the evolutionary drivers of sexual allocation, demonstrating that male and female investment evolve under distinct selective pressures in hermaphroditic species.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBrassicaceaeOvulePollenPhylogenyPollinationPolyploidyReproductionBrassicaceaeevolutionary responsemating systemphylogenetic constraintsploidy levelpollinator abundanceSexual allocation

Identifiers

PMID40754950
PMCPMC13487425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.