ArticleBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2025
[Impact of donor human milk bank on clinical outcomes in infants with very/extremely low birth weight].
Article in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the differences in breastfeeding rates and the incidence of clinical complications in very/extremely low birth weight infants with and without the use of donor milk banks.
methodsBefore and after the establishment of the donor milk bank, a total of 279 very/extremely low birth weight infants who were hospitalized in neonatal intensive care unit in a tertiary hospital in Beijing were selected. In the study, 136 infants who did not receive donated breast-feeding were included in control group and 143 infants who received donated breast-feeding were included in observation group. The clinical data of mothers and their infants were collected. The mother' s information included gestational age, maternal comorbidities, and mode of delivery. Infant information includes gender, weight, gestational age, duration of breastfeeding, total enteral feeding time, hospitalization time and incidence of complications (feeding intolerance, necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity).
resultsThe maternal ages were (33.5 ± 4.2) years in the observation group and (32.5 ± 3.9) years in the control group. Cesareans were performed in 95 cases (70.4%) and 81 cases (66.9%), respectively. The gestational ages of preterm infants were (29.2 ± 2.1) weeks and (29.1 ± 2.2) weeks, with birth weights of (1 140.5 ± 247.1) g and (1 169.4 ± 228.6) g, respectively. Newborn boys accounted for 72 cases (50.3%) in the observation group and 63 cases (46.3%) in the control group. No statistically significant differences were found in baseline characteristics between the two groups (all
conclusionThe use of donor milk bank can improve the breastfeeding rate, shorten the time to first breastfeeding, and reduce the incidence of feeding intolerance in very/extremely low birth weight infants, which provides a reference for the clinical treatment of very/extremely low birth weight infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40754916PMC12330917What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.