ArticleCell transplantation
Efficacy and safety of Bio 3D conduits composed of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: A proof-of-concept study in a canine ulnar nerve defect model.
Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 3D bioprinting and mesenchymal stem cells: A bibliometric analysis of emerging trends and advancements.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral nerve injuries involving nerve defects remain challenging to treat. Although autologous nerve grafting is considered the gold standard, it has notable limitations, including donor site morbidity. To address this, we developed a scaffold-free Bio 3D conduit composed of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (UC-MSCs) using bioprinting technology. In this study, we evaluated its efficacy and safety in a canine ulnar nerve defect model. At 10 weeks postoperatively, the Bio 3D group showed better motor and sensory recovery compared with the allograft group, as demonstrated by the pinprick test, electrophysiological studies, and hypothenar muscle wet weight (0.978 ± 0.100 vs. 0.637 ± 0.151, n = 3). Morphometric analysis revealed greater axonal regeneration, including larger myelinated axon diameters (4.27 ± 0.342 µm vs. 3.69 ± 0.161 µm, n = 3) and thicker myelin sheaths (0.621 ± 0.088 µm vs. 0.497 ± 0.021 µm, n = 3). Immunostaining showed that the number of transplanted UC-MSCs diminished over time, likely after exerting their therapeutic effects. No adverse events, systemic abnormalities, or distant human cell migration was observed. These findings suggest that UC-MSC-derived Bio 3D conduits are a promising alternative for peripheral nerve regeneration, especially for patients wishing to avoid donor nerve harvesting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.