ReviewThe British journal of educational psychology2026
The potential and limitations of large language models for automatic classification of teachers' motivational messages in educational research.
Review in The British journal of educational psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The potential and limitations of large language models for automatic classification of teachers' motivational messages in educational research.The British journal of educational psychology · 2026Review
- A process-oriented perspective on pre-service teachers' self-efficacy and their motivational messages: Using large language models to classify teachers' speech.The British journal of educational psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has created new opportunities in educational research, particularly in the efficient analysis of complex social interactions within classrooms. One promising area involves the classification of teachers' motivational messages. Traditionally, such assessments have relied on self-reports and observer evaluations, which require a lot of staff and time resources. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have been employed to classify teachers' motivational messages, offering novel, less labour-intensive approaches for classification.
aimsBuilding on these recent developments, this work presents a comprehensive literature overview exploring the applications, potential, and limitations of using LLMs to classify teachers' motivational messages.
resultsThe present comprehensive literature overview indicates that the use of LLMs for classifying teachers' motivational messages is a promising yet still emerging field of research. Recent studies have applied LLMs in innovative ways, drawing on established motivational theories and employing novel classification techniques, such as zero-shot and few-shot prompting or fine-tuning, to classify motivational messages. Open questions remain, particularly concerning the structure, quantity, and quality of annotated material. DISCUSSION: Whereas recent studies have demonstrated the potential of LLMs to offer scalable and time-efficient alternatives for classifying motivational messages in the classroom, several challenges persist. These include concerns related to the quality and quantity of training data, model generalisability, the ability to capture the complexity of classroom interactions, and biases involved in integrating LLMs as a classification method. This comprehensive literature overview provides practical recommendations for the responsible use of LLMs in educational research and school practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.