Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40754713›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of educational psychology2026

The potential and limitations of large language models for automatic classification of teachers' motivational messages in educational research.

Olivia Metzner, Yindong Wang, Gerard de Melo, Wendy Symes, Yizhen Huang, Rebecca Lazarides

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of educational psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olivia MetznerDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0953-5839
Yindong WangChair of Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Systems, Hasso-Plattner-Institute/University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3946-1432
Gerard de MeloChair of Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Systems, Hasso-Plattner-Institute/University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2930-2059
Wendy SymesInstitute for Psychology in Education, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2110-0505
Yizhen HuangDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7041-1927
Rebecca LazaridesDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0392-4981

Funding

German Research Foundation DFG: LA 3522/15-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has created new opportunities in educational research, particularly in the efficient analysis of complex social interactions within classrooms. One promising area involves the classification of teachers' motivational messages. Traditionally, such assessments have relied on self-reports and observer evaluations, which require a lot of staff and time resources. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have been employed to classify teachers' motivational messages, offering novel, less labour-intensive approaches for classification.

aimsBuilding on these recent developments, this work presents a comprehensive literature overview exploring the applications, potential, and limitations of using LLMs to classify teachers' motivational messages.

resultsThe present comprehensive literature overview indicates that the use of LLMs for classifying teachers' motivational messages is a promising yet still emerging field of research. Recent studies have applied LLMs in innovative ways, drawing on established motivational theories and employing novel classification techniques, such as zero-shot and few-shot prompting or fine-tuning, to classify motivational messages. Open questions remain, particularly concerning the structure, quantity, and quality of annotated material. DISCUSSION: Whereas recent studies have demonstrated the potential of LLMs to offer scalable and time-efficient alternatives for classifying motivational messages in the classroom, several challenges persist. These include concerns related to the quality and quantity of training data, model generalisability, the ability to capture the complexity of classroom interactions, and biases involved in integrating LLMs as a classification method. This comprehensive literature overview provides practical recommendations for the responsible use of LLMs in educational research and school practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMotivationSchool TeachersHumansLarge Language Modelsartificial intelligenceclassroomlarge language modelsmotivational messagesnatural language processingteacher

Identifiers

PMID40754713
PMCPMC12879533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.