ArticleHealth promotion international2025
Organizational health literacy of schools in Germany: results of a cross-sectional study.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- School principals' COVID-19 health literacy and its association with mental health: international findings from 11 countries in Europe and Asia.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Development of a Theory-Based Adolescent Health Literacy Intervention: A Case of Nepal.Health literacy research and practice · 2026Article
- Teachers' Well-Being and Health in Germany: Representative Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- International consensus on school health literacy responsiveness: findings from a modified Delphi process.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- The value of health literacy for Global Health and One Health: nurturing the socioecological environment of schools.Health promotion international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A social gradient in health literacy is prevalent in children and adolescents, with those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds often having lower levels. Interventions aiming at an entire setting, such as the organizational health literacy approach, seem promising to tackle these inequities. Schools represent unique environments to implement such interventions. The HeLit-Schools project aimed at developing an organizational health literacy framework for schools. The framework contains eight quality standards, each underpinned by six indicators, and was translated into a self-assessment tool (OHLS-Q). In this cross-sectional study, the German version of the OHLS-Q was used to assess the implementation status of organizational health literacy in schools in Germany for the first time. School management members completed the questionnaire via an online survey, including sociodemographic, personal, and school information. Descriptive statistics were reported. The n = 598 participants from five federal states were Ø 52.3 years old and mainly female (73.6%). 49.1% worked in primary, 37% in secondary, and 13.9% in special education schools. Overall, respondents reported that 65.1% of the standards and indicators of the framework were (rather) highly implemented. A great variance can be found between the individual standards and indicators. Schools already participating in school health promotion programs or networks showed a higher percentage of implementation across all standards. A lack of resources (financial, time, and personnel) is reported. The results reveal important insights into barriers and facilitators for the implementation of organizational health literacy in schools. Future studies should focus on interventions that overcome identified barriers, targeting specific standards and indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.