ArticleJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2025
Comparative study of the efficacy of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors among breast cancer patients at Kenyatta National Hospital.
Article in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAromatase inhibitors have demonstrated superior outcomes compared to tamoxifen in various studies. However, research in Africa, including Kenya, where breast cancer mortality rates are disproportionately high, is lacking.
objectivesThe study aimed to assess the comparative efficacy of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors among hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients at Kenyatta National Hospital.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Oncology Department of Kenyatta National Hospital, involving all eligible hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients treated in the facility between 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2022. The study was hospital-based and used a data abstraction tool to collect data from the patients' medical records. The data obtained was then analyzed using SPSS version 25 and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the median survival time. Cox regression analysis was employed to determine whether there was a significant association between the variables. The collected data was presented in the form of frequency tables and graphs.
resultsIn our study, aromatase inhibitors consistently demonstrated superior outcomes compared to tamoxifen across various parameters. Specifically, aromatase inhibitors showed a lower incidence of disease progression (24% vs. 29.7%), a higher rate of complete radiological response (24% vs. 13.5%), and a reduced likelihood of developing distant metastasis while on treatment, coupled with a lower mortality rate (40% vs. 48.0%). Additionally, the median survival time for patients receiving aromatase inhibitors was notably longer at 49.0 months compared to 42.0 ± 3.6 months for those on tamoxifen (P = 0.410). Similarly, the aromatase inhibitor group exhibited a more extended median metastasis-free survival time (42.0 months vs. 30.0 ± 1.4 months, P = 0.056) and a more favorable survival time from metastasis to death (8 ± 0.6 months vs. 6 ± 0.8 months in the tamoxifen group, P = 0.142).
conclusionThese findings collectively suggest a consistent trend towards improved treatment outcomes with aromatase inhibitors compared to tamoxifen. The observed reduction in mortality rates among aromatase inhibitor-treated patients highlights their potential clinical benefit, with superior overall survival and disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.