Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40754612›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A risk analysis method for potential failure modes in the lithium-ion battery assembly process based on optimized FMEA and DHHFLTS.

Jinkun Dai, Jihong Pang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jinkun DaiCollege of New Energy Equipment, Zhejiang College of Security Technology, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Jihong PangCollege of Business, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, 312000, China. pangjihong@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72271167Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education General Project Y202456059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To enhance product quality and operational safety of lithium-ion batteries, this paper proposes a risk analysis method based on an optimized Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). Firstly, as an evaluation language with a double-hierarchy structure, the Double Hierarchy Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set (DHHFLTS) can both express rich semantics and accurately capture the evaluators' hesitancy. Secondly, the Similarity Measure (SM) and Water Filling Theory (WFT) are utilized to calculate the consensus degree of evaluator's evaluation information, thereby determining the weight information. Compared to the current methods that calculates weights based on the dispersion of evaluation information, SM-WFT is more suitable for FMEA. Then, the Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) employs multiple aggregation methods for compromise calculation, thereby minimizing the likelihood of identical risk rankings in FMEA. Finally, addressing the difficulty of experimentally verifying the calculation results of new methods, this paper proposes a Multi-Objective Aggregation Technique (MOAT). By constructing a multi-objective mathematical model, a comparative analysis is conducted on the risk ranking results and evaluation information obtained from the new method versus other methods. At the end of the paper, a case study on risk analysis of potential failure modes in the lithium-ion battery assembly process is presented to verify the practicality and objectivity of the new method.

Indexed as

CoCoSoDouble hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term setMulti-Objective aggregation techniquePotential failure modes risk analysisSM-WFT

Identifiers

PMID40754612
PMCPMC12319098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.