ArticleScientific reports2025
A risk analysis method for potential failure modes in the lithium-ion battery assembly process based on optimized FMEA and DHHFLTS.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To enhance product quality and operational safety of lithium-ion batteries, this paper proposes a risk analysis method based on an optimized Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). Firstly, as an evaluation language with a double-hierarchy structure, the Double Hierarchy Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set (DHHFLTS) can both express rich semantics and accurately capture the evaluators' hesitancy. Secondly, the Similarity Measure (SM) and Water Filling Theory (WFT) are utilized to calculate the consensus degree of evaluator's evaluation information, thereby determining the weight information. Compared to the current methods that calculates weights based on the dispersion of evaluation information, SM-WFT is more suitable for FMEA. Then, the Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) employs multiple aggregation methods for compromise calculation, thereby minimizing the likelihood of identical risk rankings in FMEA. Finally, addressing the difficulty of experimentally verifying the calculation results of new methods, this paper proposes a Multi-Objective Aggregation Technique (MOAT). By constructing a multi-objective mathematical model, a comparative analysis is conducted on the risk ranking results and evaluation information obtained from the new method versus other methods. At the end of the paper, a case study on risk analysis of potential failure modes in the lithium-ion battery assembly process is presented to verify the practicality and objectivity of the new method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.