ArticleScientific reports2025
Adapting foundation models for rapid clinical response: intracerebral hemorrhage segmentation in emergency settings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a medical emergency that demands rapid and accurate diagnosis for optimal patient management. Hemorrhagic lesions' segmentation on CT scans is a necessary first step for acquiring quantitative imaging data that are becoming increasingly useful in the clinical setting. However, traditional manual segmentation is time-consuming and prone to inter-rater variability, creating a need for automated solutions. This study introduces a novel approach combining advanced deep learning models to segment extensive and morphologically variable ICH lesions in non-contrast CT scans. We propose a two-step methodology that begins with a user-defined loose bounding box around the lesion, followed by a fine-tuned YOLOv8-S object detection model to generate precise, slice-specific bounding boxes. These bounding boxes are then used to prompt the Medical Segment Anything Model for accurate lesion segmentation. Our pipeline achieves high segmentation accuracy with minimal supervision, demonstrating strong potential as a practical alternative to task-specific models. We evaluated the model on a dataset of 252 CT scans demonstrating high performance in segmentation accuracy and robustness. Finally, the resulting segmentation tool is integrated into a user-friendly web application prototype, offering clinicians a simple interface for lesion identification and radiomic quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.