Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40754416›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2025

Isolation of vapA-positive Rhodococcus equi from soil and fecal samples in Mongolia.

Otgontuya Ganbaatar, Sumiya Ganzorig, Erdene-Ochir Tseren-Ochir, Yasunori Suzuki, Shinji Takai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Otgontuya GanbaatarProject office for Strengthening the Practical Capacity of Public and Private Veterinarians, School of Veterinary Medicine, Mongolian University of Life Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Sumiya GanzorigProject office for Strengthening the Practical Capacity of Public and Private Veterinarians, School of Veterinary Medicine, Mongolian University of Life Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Erdene-Ochir Tseren-OchirDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Mongolian University of Life Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Yasunori SuzukiLaboratory of Veterinary Hygiene, Institute of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinji TakaiProject office for Strengthening the Practical Capacity of Public and Private Veterinarians, School of Veterinary Medicine, Mongolian University of Life Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2024, 90 soil samples and 11 fecal samples were collected from nine Mongolian provinces. Using NANAT selective agar, R. equi was successfully isolated from 23 soil samples (25.6%) across five provinces and from three fecal samples (27.3%) collected in two provinces. A total of 122 isolates were identified as R. equi via choE-targeted polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and subsequently screened for virulence-associated genes (vapA, vapB, and vapN) by PCR. Of these, 17 isolates tested positive for the vapA gene, while the remaining 105 isolates were negative for both vapB and vapN. Plasmid profiling of the vapA-positive isolates revealed the presence of an 85-kb type I virulence plasmid, which is common in isolates from Europe and North America. This is the first documented detection of vapA-positive R. equi in Mongolia.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsFecesRhodococcus equiSoil MicrobiologyAnimalsMongoliaPlasmidsPolymerase Chain ReactionBacterial ProteinsVapA protein, Rhodococcus equihorseMongoliaRhodococcus equisoilvapA

Identifiers

PMID40754416
PMCPMC12508559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.