Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40754365›Full record

Observational studyThe lancet. Healthy longevity2025

Occurrence, associated factors, and outcomes of delirium in patients in an adult acute general medicine service in England: a 10-year longitudinal, observational study.

Jasmine Ming Gan, Emily Louise Boucher, Nicola Georgia Lovett, Sophie Roche, Sarah Catherine Smith, Sarah Tamsin Pendlebury

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The lancet. Healthy longevity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Who Is Delirium Worse For?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jasmine Ming GanWolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Emily Louise BoucherWolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nicola Georgia LovettDepartments of Acute General Internal Medicine and Geratology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Sophie RocheMedical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sarah Catherine SmithDepartments of Acute General Internal Medicine and Geratology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Sarah Tamsin PendleburyWolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: sarah.pendlebury@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReliable estimates of delirium occurrence and outcomes are necessary to inform hospital services, research, and policy, but inclusive cohorts with long-term follow-up are scarce. We aimed to assess the age-specific occurrence of delirium in acute general (internal) medicine, associated factors, and 10-year outcomes stratified by age and comorbid dementia status.

methodsThis longitudinal, observational study was done at the John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford, UK). We included consecutive adult patients aged 16 years and older in an acute general (internal) medicine service over six 8-week periods (between Sept 4, 2010, and Nov 15, 2018). Delirium was diagnosed prospectively using the Confusion Assessment Method and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, criteria and subcategorised as prevalent (≤48 h of admission) or incident (>48 h postadmission). Odds ratios adjusted (

findings1846 patients were admitted to acute general (internal) medicine (mean age 68·2 years [SD 20·0], age range 16-102 years), 426 (23% [95% CI 21-25]) of whom had delirium (prevalent n=290 [68%], incident n=73 [17%], both prevalent and incident n=63 [15%]), of whom 134 (31·5%) had dementia. 950 (51·5%) patients were female, 895 (48·5%) were male, and sex data were missing for one patient. Delirium increased with age, from six (2% [95% CI 1-4]) of 340 patients younger than 50 years and 31 (9% [6-13]) of 333 patients at age 50-64 years to 57 (20% [16-25]) of 281 at age 65-74 years, 245 (35% [31-38]) of 704 at age 75-89 years, and 87 (46% [39-54]) of 188 at age 90 years and older. Of the 37 patients younger than 65 years who had delirium, 28 (76%) had an underlying neurological or neuropsychiatric disorder. In those aged 65 years or older, delirium was overall associated (all p<0·001, age and sex adjusted) with dementia (

interpretationOur findings support current guidelines for routine on-admission delirium screening from age 65 years. Delirium outcomes are relatively more adverse in those aged 65-74 years without comorbid dementia in whom interventions and clinical trials should be prioritised.

fundingNational Institute for Health and Care Research and the Medical Research Council.

Indexed as

DeliriumAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsComorbidityDementiaEnglandFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID40754365
PMCPMC12316638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.