ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2026
Deriving Mendelian Randomization-Based Causal Networks of Brain Imaging Phenotypes and Bipolar Disorder.
Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping Structural Neuroimaging Trajectories in Bipolar Disorder: Neurobiological and Clinical Implications.Biological psychiatry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeuroanatomical variation in individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) has been described previously in observational studies. However, the causal dynamics of these relationships remain unexplored.
methodsWe performed Mendelian randomization (MR) of 297 structural and functional neuroimaging phenotypes from the UK Biobank and BD using genome-wide association study summary statistics. We carried out a suite of sensitivity analyses and identified phenotypic categories with the greatest effect on BD. We applied a novel inverse sparse regression model that accounts for covariance between sets of correlated effects to estimate direct causal effects (DCEs), which represent the effect of one phenotype conditional on all other effects. We used DCE weights to create causal scores for BD using neuroimaging data from 3 clinical cohorts.
resultsWe found 28 significant causal relationship pairs after multiple testing correction containing BD as a term, 27 of which described neuroimaging phenotype effects on BD. White matter tract phenotypes had larger absolute effects on BD than vice versa in MR tests and estimated DCE solutions. We found that white matter phenotypes had significantly larger out-degrees than non-white matter tract phenotypes across network solutions. A causal score constructed using neuroimaging causal estimates was a significant predictor of BD in an adolescent cohort (odds ratio = 0.79).
conclusionsMR analyses suggest that neuroanatomical variation, specifically in white matter tracts such as the longitudinal fasciculi, is likely a cause rather than a consequence of BD. Verification of estimated causal relationships requires replication and triangulation of evidence approaches using other study designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.