Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40753522›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2025

A Phase IIa, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Brensocatib in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis.

Michael W Konstan, James J Tolle, Emily DiMango, Patrick A Flume, Helen Usansky, Ariel Teper, Christina N Ramirez, Jimmy Flarakos, Jessica Basso, Sherry Li and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05090904 (A Phase 2a, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Brensocatib Tablets in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05090904 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2a, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Brensocatib Tablets in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorInsmed IncorporatedRan2021 to 2022Enrolled29ConditionsCystic FibrosisArmsBrensocatib, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michael W KonstanCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
James J TolleVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Emily DiMangoColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Patrick A FlumeMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Helen UsanskyInsmed Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Ariel TeperInsmed Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Christina N RamirezInsmed Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Jimmy FlarakosInsmed Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Jessica BassoInsmed Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Sherry LiInsmed Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Marcela VergaraInsmed Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ, USA. Marcela.Vergara@insmed.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesBrensocatib, an oral, competitive, and reversible inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase 1 (DPP1), reduces exacerbations and lung function decline in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE). This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and tolerability of brensocatib in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF), comparing these findings with data from previous trials in healthy adults and in those with NCFBE to inform dose selection for future clinical trials.

methodsA phase IIa, single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to assess the PK, PD, safety, and tolerability of brensocatib in adults with CF. Participants were randomly assigned to receive once-daily brensocatib (10 mg, 25 mg, or 40 mg) or placebo for 28 days. The study planned enrollment of up to 34 adults, stratified on the basis of their CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator use, to evaluate the PK profile of brensocatib and its safety compared with placebo. Primary PK parameters, including maximum plasma concentration (C

resultsA total of 29 participants were randomized to treatment, with 21 stratified to the CFTR modulator group. Baseline characteristics were similar among cohorts. Mean age was 37.9 (standard deviation (SD) 14.6) years, and most participants exhibited mild-to-moderate lung disease. PK analysis showed dose-dependent and predictable brensocatib exposure, with comparable profiles between participants with and without use of CFTR modulators. In addition, PK profiles in participants were comparable to those of healthy adults and of those with NCFBE. Pharmacodynamic analysis revealed dose-dependent reduction in neutrophil serine protease (NSP) activity, reaching saturation around the 25-mg dose, particularly in blood. Brensocatib at all doses was well tolerated with no new identified safety signals.

conclusionsBrensocatib demonstrated consistent PK profiles independent of CFTR therapy and comparable to those of healthy and NCFBE adults. Brensocatib reduced blood and sputum NSP levels. The safety profile was comparable to previous studies, with no new safety concerns identified, supporting the use of similar dosing for adults with CF as for other populations. These findings advocate for further investigation of brensocatib in CF. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT05090904.

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisAdolescentAdultCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator

Identifiers

PMID40753522
PMCPMC12479633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.