ArticleBMC health services research2025
"Who's got the infants in mind?" A qualitative exploration of the barriers and enablers to commissioning parent-infant relationship services in England.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe earliest relationships between babies and their caregivers can act as a risk factor for social and emotional wellbeing in infancy and impact on later development. Difficulties in parent-infant relationships (PAIR) are characterised by inequalities, with families experiencing adversity at greater risk. In the absence of support, these relationship problems may require later, more expensive services. Interventions exist to address PAIR difficulties but are not widely commissioned, with regional disparities, and infants being under-served. This project qualitatively explored barriers and enablers to commissioning PAIR services.
methodsIndividuals with commissioning responsibilities relating to PAIR working in Clinical Commissioning Groups or Local Authorities in the North East North Cumbria (NENC) region were invited to participate. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were informed by a topic guide developed through practitioner involvement. Nine interviews were completed online between February and April 2022. Anonymised transcripts were analysed using Framework Analysis.
resultsBarriers and enablers to commissioning were general, specific to PAIR services, or related to the pandemic context. General factors included the nature of the commissioning process, the importance of taking a collaborative approach to commissioning and the constraints of funding processes. Commissioners valued being able to demonstrate impact and value for money through service evaluation but faced challenges in doing so. Specific barriers relating to PAIR commissioning included a lack of awareness of the importance of infant mental health although there was an acknowledgement of the importance of maternal and parent-infant services/support during the early years. Factors amenable to change were mapped on to the Behaviour Change Wheel to inform the future co-development of a resource to address barriers and enablers.
conclusionsThis paper is the first to report a pragmatic, applied qualitative exploration of barriers and enablers to commissioning parent-infant relationship services. Insights from commissioners with a wide range of portfolios identified key factors operating at the individual level which were amenable to change. In addition, there were barriers beyond the individual level, such as funding. Using a pragmatic approach, we identified best-fit behaviour change initiatives to develop a commissioning support toolkit to increase access to support, improve outcomes, and decrease inequalities, addressing infants as an under-served group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.