ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2025
On-farm testing of reduced animal welfare demands on productivity and welfare in pig production.
Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSwedish animal welfare requirements exceed those of EU, which may have contributed to decreased pig production in Sweden since joining EU. On request from stakeholders, the Swedish Board of Agriculture allowed testing effects of reduced welfare demands on pig production for one year. This included weaning before 28 days at individual level, temporary confinements of sows during farrowing and mating, and increased stocking density of growers. The intervention period lasted for one year, and the productivity was compared with the preceding year.
resultsA reduced mean weaning age from 32 to 27 days did not have a significant effect on piglet welfare measures but the annual number of piglets weaned per sow increased by 1.3. Temporary confinement of sows at farrowing had no significant effect on piglet mortality or productivity, but the confinement reduced sow welfare. Temporary confinement of sows during mating did not improve sow productivity. Instead, hygiene and welfare decreased due to the confinement. Decreased stocking density by 10% compared with Swedish requirements had no significant effect on welfare measures. Nor did weight gain differ from the previous year. However, increased batch size of fatteners increased the incidence of respiratory lesions at slaughter, impaired growth and feed conversion.
conclusionsSimulations assured that over 90% of the piglets were older than 25 days in batches weaned at a mean age of 28 days. As piglets mature from three to four weeks of age, this was important for piglet welfare. Short-term confinement of sows at farrowing or mating decreased sow welfare due to the confinement while no significant increase in piglet productivity was found. An increased stocking density by 10% of weaners and growers did not affect welfare measures but increased the number of potential disease transmissions between pigs by 22% due to increased batch sizes. When batch size increased, respiratory lesions at slaughter increased and productivity decreased. Based on the results, the Board of Agriculture allowed herds to wean at a mean age of 28 days provided they complied with special requirements. Except for this, the minimal legal requirements of pig welfare in Sweden remained unchanged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.