ArticleBMC oral health2025
Automatic restoration and reconstruction of defective tooth based on deep learning technology.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate restoration and reconstruction of tooth morphology are crucial in restorative dentistry, implantology, and forensic odontology. Traditional methods, like manual wax modeling and template-based computer-aided design (CAD), struggle with accuracy, personalization, and efficiency. To address the challenge, we propose an innovative and efficient deep learning-based framework designed for the automatic restoration and reconstruction of tooth morphology.
methodsThe proposed method contains three stages. Firstly, an RGB image of a defective tooth is inputted into the restoration network, which fills in the missing regions to produce a complete RGB image of the tooth. The resulting image is then converted to a grayscale image in the preprocessing stage to ensure compatibility with the subsequent reconstruction process. Finally, the 3D reconstruction network utilizes the grayscale image to generate a detailed 3D mesh model of the tooth.
resultsThe experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior performance in restoration quality, reconstruction accuracy, generalization, and inference speed, with an average time of 12 s per image. Notably, compared to the original Pixel2Mesh, the improved ResNet50-based Pixel2Mesh enhances the average F-Score, CD, and EMD for reconstructed tooth models by 26.5%, 34.7%, and 22.3%, respectively.
conclusionsThe approach proposed in this paper offers a promising solution for personalized intelligent, and efficient tooth restoration and reconstruction, providing a valuable tool for dental diagnostics and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.