ArticleBMC public health2025
Evaluating intersectional variation of HPV-associated cancers in rural America.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rural-urban disparities in breast cancer incidence among US women aged 20-49: trends by race/ethnicity, stage, poverty, and state from 2000-2019.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Viral Infections of the Vulva: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFor decades, incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers has been increasing in rural communities across the United States. Although emerging evidence shows a widening rural-urban disparity, rural intersectionality has been understudied. Our study examined the incidence of HPV-associated cancers within rural communities to identify differences by race/ethnicity for males and females, and explore how these differences varied by cancer type, socioeconomic, and geographic factors.
methodsWe accessed age-adjusted cancer incidence rates (2010-2019) from the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) for HPV-associated cancers (cervical, vaginal, vulvar, penile, anal, oropharyngeal) in rural counties. Stratifying by sex, we calculated incidence rate ratios by race/ethnicity. Subgroup analyses included age, site, census-tract poverty, census tract socioeconomics, and region.
resultsBetween 2010 and 2019, rural HPV-associated cancer was 11.8 cases per 100,000 population. We found significant heterogeneity within male (10.5) and female (13.2) rates. For males, the lowest rate was found in non-Hispanic Asian-American/Pacific-Islander populations (3.7) and Hispanic populations (4.8), and the highest rate was found in non-Hispanic White populations (11.2). For females, the lowest rate was also found in Hispanic Asian-American/Pacific-Islander populations (8.8) and the highest rates were found in non-Hispanic Black (13.8) and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native populations (14.5). However, these racial/ethnic differences varied across rural subpopulations, geography, and poverty.
conclusionsAppreciating the diversity of the rural cancer burden can be used to effectively develop and implement public health interventions to address HPV-related cancer disparities in rural communities. Actions are needed to prioritize reducing the burden of HPV-associated cancer in AIAN populations in high-poverty rural communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.