ArticleBMC cancer2025
Institutional management factors influencing compliance with National Cancer Treatment Guidelines for cervical cancer: a case study from ocean road cancer institute, Tanzania.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital oncology frameworks in Africa: a scoping review of architectural patterns, digital maturity, and data equity implications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women, with approximately 604,000 new cases and 342,000 deaths reported in 2020. Like many other countries, Tanzania adopted the National Cancer Treatment Guidelines (NCTGs) in 2020 to improve the quality of care and ensure patient safety. However, despite the adoption of these guidelines, cervical cancer care in many healthcare facilities remains unstandardized. This study aimed to explore the institutional management factors influencing compliance with the NCTGs for cervical cancer care at Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI). A case study design using a process evaluation approach was employed to assess the role of institutional management in influencing guidelines adherence. The study was conducted at ORCI, where 20 healthcare providers were purposively selected for in-depth interviews based on their experience and depth of knowledge on the topic. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated from Swahili to English. Thematic analysis was conducted by coding and organizing the transcribed texts to identify emerging themes and sub-themes. Findings revealed that key institutional management factors promoting compliance with the NCTGs at ORCI include the existence of a well-defined policy on guidelines utilization, a supportive working environment, and a well-established support system. Conversely, a significant barrier identified was the low healthcare provider-to-patient ratio and machine downtime. The study found that strong institutional management characterized by clear policies, a supportive work environment, and effective support systems facilitates adherence to the NCTGs at ORCI. Nonetheless, the shortage of healthcare personnel poses a major challenge. Therefore, it is essential for the Ministry of Health, in collaboration with ORCI management, to recruit additional oncologists, surgeons, and other critical healthcare professionals. Strengthening the provider-to-patient ratio is crucial for improving compliance with the NCTGs and ultimately enhancing the quality of cervical cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.