ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2025
Enhancing Development Strategies Through Early Scientific Advice from HTA Agencies-Experiences, Expectations and Best Practices from Health Technology Developers.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEarly health technology assessment (HTA) advice provides value to pharmaceutical companies during drug development by identifying potential data gaps, refining study designs, and improving understanding of HTA agencies' evidentiary requirements. This study evaluated the landscape, benefits, and challenges of early HTA advice, with a focus on European agencies and global practices amid the transition to the EU HTA Regulation.
methodsA perception survey involving 12 pharmaceutical companies explored engagement with HTA agencies, challenges, and strategic priorities. Additionally, a forum was conducted with 22 company representatives, discussing internal and external best practices. Key topics included the evolving role of Joint Scientific Consultations (JSCs), integration of real-world evidence (RWE), and incorporation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into advice processes.
resultsThe findings highlighted active engagement with national agencies such as NICE and G-BA and European initiatives like EUnetHTA Joint Actions. NICE advice was valued for cost-effectiveness insights, but its post-Brexit absence reduced collaboration at the European level. JSCs under the EU HTA Regulation were seen as critical, but resource constraints and limited availability posed challenges. Companies prioritized topics such as comparator choices, outcome measures, and RWE but faced internal barriers like resource allocation and unclear decision criteria. Outside Europe, uptake of advice services, such as those from CDA-AMC, remained limited but underscored the potential of lifecycle approaches for iterative learning.
conclusionsEarly HTA advice is essential in pharmaceutical development. Enhancing JSC capacity, stakeholder engagement, and feedback mechanisms will strengthen alignment between companies and HTA agencies, fostering evidence-based decision-making and improved health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40753360What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.