Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40753330›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Efficient temporary pollen storage techniques for quality kiwifruit production.

Sudip Kumar Dutta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sudip Kumar DuttaICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Sikkim Centre, Tadong, Gangtok, 737102, Sikkim, India. sudipiari@rediffmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asynchronisation in kiwifruit male and female flower anthesis is a common phenomenon across the kiwifruit-growing areas worldwide. This situation demands efficient short-term pollen storage techniques for successful kiwifruit production. Kiwifruit pollen was stored at room temperature, 0 °C, - 4 °C, - 10 °C, and - 20 °C. Six distinct storage periods- 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 days were provided for pollen collected in cryo-vials under various storage temperatures. As tested by in vitro germination and acetocarmine tests, the analysis of variance clearly showed that storage method, days of storage, and the interaction between storage methods and days of storage had a highly significant effect (p ≤ 0.0001) on pollen viability. Room-temperature storage revealed a sharp decline in pollen viability as assessed by acetocarmine test and in vitro germination test and complete viability was lost within 42 days after pollen storage. Pollen storage at 0 °C, - 4 °C, - 10 °C and - 20 °C storage revealed considerable good pollen viability in terms of in vitro germination test and acetocarmine test as compared to room-temperature storage after 42 days of storage. The rate of decline of pollen viability was in the order of 0 °C > - 4 °C > - 10 °C > - 20 °C. Pollination with low-temperature stored pollen also revealed significantly higher fruit yield and quality parameters in comparison to room-temperature stored pollen. Therefore, our findings point to a dependable approach for preserving kiwifruit pollen those farmers may apply to get good quality and high yielding fruits.

Indexed as

ActinidiaPollenFlowersFruitGerminationPollinationTemperature− 20 °CActinidia deliciosaKiwifruitLow temperaturePollenPollen storage

Identifiers

PMID40753330
PMCPMC12318124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.