ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted regimens with or without anthracyclines for HER2-positive inflammatory breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- HER2DX in HER2-positive inflammatory breast cancer: correlative insights and comparative analysis with noninflammatory breast cancers.ESMO open · 2025Trial
- [Anthracycline use in breast cancer based on our current knowledge].Magyar onkologia · 2026Review
- Pathologic complete response and survival in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with or without anthracyclines.Ecancermedicalscience · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing vs. anthracycline-free chemotherapy with dual HER2 blockade in HER2-Positive breast cancer: a Systematic Review and meta-analysis.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRandomized clinical trials have shown no benefit from adding anthracyclines to neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer; however, the efficacy in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is unknown. Here we compared pathologic response rates for preoperative regimens with or without anthracyclines in HER2-positive primary IBC.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with HER2-positive primary IBC in 2014-2021 who received neoadjuvant therapy and modified radical mastectomy at MD Anderson Cancer Center, IBC Network institutions and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. The primary outcome was a pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary outcomes included time to local or regional recurrence (TLRR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed with adjustments for clinically relevant covariates.
resultsOf the 101 patients included, 39 received docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (TCHP), and 62 (docetaxel, trastuzumab, pertuzumab, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide) received THP-AC regimen. Median follow-up time was 3.02 years. The pCR rates did not differ by regimen type (48.7% TCHP vs. 53.2% THP-AC, p = 0.659). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age and estrogen receptor positivity showed no association between pCR or regimen. The multivariable Cox model showed that the patients who received THP-AC had longer TLRR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.279, 95% CI 0.102-0.765, p = 0.0131) and EFS (HR 0.462, 95% CI 0.228-0.936, p = 0.032), with no difference in OS.
conclusionThese findings indicate that an anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant regimen is not associated with pCR, but may prolong disease control in patients with HER2-positive IBC. Further investigation of the optimal neoadjuvant regimen for such tumors is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40753318What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.