ArticleScientific reports2025
Statistical optimization of process variables for enhanced serratiopeptidase production from soil Serratia marcescens VS56.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Production, optimization, and purification of serratiopeptidase fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serratiopeptidase was recognized as a clinically valuable proteolytic enzyme due to its potent anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties, widely employed in pharmaceutical formulations for the treatment of arthritis, sinusitis, and post-operative swelling. The present study focused on enhancing the production and purification of serratiopeptidase from Serratia marcescens VS56 (OQ859929). Initially, a One-Factor-At-a-Time (OFAT) approach was used to evaluate the effects of production parameters including carbon and nitrogen sources, pH, and temperature on enzyme production. This was followed by statistical optimization using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and the Box-Behnken design. Glucose and beef extract, at pH 7 ± 0.3 and 37 °C, were identified as the optimal conditions, under which serratiopeptidase production reached 6516.4 U/mL, reflecting a 63.65 ± 0.3% increase compared to the basal medium. The crude enzyme extract was subjected to ammonium sulphate precipitation, dialysis, and final purification. The total protein content reduced from 10.2 mg (crude extract) to 0.4 mg (final purified enzyme), while specific activity increased significantly from 15996.07 U/mg to 30658 U/mg, indicating a 95%-fold purification. Correspondingly, total enzyme activity decreased from 163,160 U in the crude extract to 12,263.2 U in the final purified fraction, resulting in an overall yield of 7.51%. SDS-PAGE analysis revealed the molecular weight of the purified enzyme to be approximately 60 kDa. This study successfully established a robust strategy for enhanced production and efficient purification of serratiopeptidase from S. marcescens VS56, offering potential for industrial and pharmaceutical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.