ArticleScientific reports2025
Chitosan pre- and post-treatment modulates molecular and physiological responses to salinity in Brassica Napus L.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Effects of High-Molecular-Weight Chitosan and Chitosan Oligosaccharide Lactate on Metabolic Adjustment and Salinity Tolerance inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Proteomic insights into nano-chitosan-induced salinity tolerance in solid matrix-primed mung bean seedlings.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Salt stress affects plant growth and development to a great extent in establishing biochemical imbalances and inducing oxidative damage. The effort was undertaken to assess the relative effectiveness of chitosan pre- and post-treatments in relieving salt stress in Brassica napus L., a moderately salt-sensitive oilseed crop, with respect to the expression patterns of P5CS, PIP, and APX genes along with proline and protein accumulation. One factorial experiment was performed under controlled conditions, where the plants were exposed to varying NaCl concentrations (50, 100, 150, and 200 mM), following either the pre-treatment of chitosan (50 mg/L) or post-treatment of chitosan (50 and 100 mg/L). Gene expression analysis by means of qRT-PCR showed a significant (p < 0.05) upregulation under pre-treatment of P5CS and APX, thereby enhancing osmoprotection and antioxidant defense; however, under post-treatment, the response of P5CS and APX was only moderate. Post-treatment levels of proline and total protein were markedly higher as well. Interestingly, proline content increased by approximately 743% in pre-treated plants at 200 mM of NaCl compared to the control (p < 0.05), indicating enhanced stress tolerance. Besides, the plants subjected to pre-treatment were perfectly grown at 200 mM NaCl whereas those subjected to post-treatment were unable to survive at 150 mM. These findings reveal that the salt tolerance mechanism is better gained by chitosan pre-treatment due to osmotic adjustment enhancement and antioxidative mechanism. This study presents the potential of chitosan to be developed as a strategic biostimulant in promoting crop resistance to saline conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.