ArticleScientific reports2025
A fast retrieval method for multilevel redundant data in grid resource business middle office based on improved decision tree algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decision tree with randomized grid search-based hyperparameter tuning and optimal feature scaling for diabetes diagnosis.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- An end-to-end framework for data lineage analysis covering link pattern recognition, fault diagnosis, and early warning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current power grid business handles massive data operations where data retrieval frequently encounters redundancy issues. Conventional decision tree-based methods struggle to achieve accurate data acquisition when facing redundant interference. To address this challenge, this study proposes a multi-level redundant data retrieval method using an improved decision tree algorithm for grid resource business center platforms. The methodology first establishes a multi-level data decision tree using grid resource business middle-platform data, then applies a decision tree pruning algorithm based on Akaike information criterion. The ant colony algorithm optimizes the pruning parameters of the decision tree model, and after obtaining optimal pruning parameters, processes the grid resource business middle-platform data decision tree to generate an improved version. Subsequently, the multi-level redundant data retrieval method based on the improved decision tree implements fast retrieval of hierarchical redundant data in grid resource business through designed repetitive data processing flows and multi-level redundant data discrimination mechanisms. The experimental results demonstrate that the improved decision tree algorithm improves multi-level redundant data retrieval accuracy by 14%. The optimized decision tree model for middle-platform data achieves more comprehensive representation of grid resource service data hierarchies and enables effective retrieval of multi-level redundant data including both image and text categories from the middle-platform data. The maximum F1-score reaches 0.99 with retrieval time of only 4.5 s, which is 1.5 s below the predefined threshold, confirming excellent practical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.