ArticleBMC urology2025
The dosimetric impacts of ct-based deep learning autocontouring algorithm for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning dosimetric accuracy of DirectORGANS.
Article in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-driven precision diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical validation of AI-assisted contouring in prostate radiation therapy treatment planning: Highlighting automation bias and the need for standardized quality assurance.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn study, we aimed to dosimetrically evaluate the usability of a new generation autocontouring algorithm (DirectORGANS) that automatically identifies organs and contours them directly in the computed tomography (CT) simulator before creating prostate radiotherapy plans.
methodsThe CT images of 10 patients were used in this study. The prostates, bladder, rectum, and femoral heads of 10 patients were automatically contoured based on DirectORGANS algorithm at the CT simulator. On the same CT image sets, the same target volumes and contours of organs at risk were manually contoured by an experienced physician using MRI images and used as a reference structure. The doses of manually delineated contours of the target volume and organs at risk and the doses of auto contours of the target volume and organs at risk were obtained from the dose volume histogram of the same plan. Conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) were calculated to evaluate the target volumes. In critical organ structures, V
resultsCompared to the doses of the manual contours (MC) with auto contours (AC), there was no significant difference between the doses of the organs at risk. However, there were statistically significant differences between HI and CI values due to differences in prostate contouring (P < 0.05).
conclusionThe study showed that the need for clinicians to edit target volumes using MRI before treatment planning. However, it demonstrated that delineating organs at risk was used safely without the need for correction. DirectORGANS algorithm is suitable for use in RT planning to minimize differences between physicians and shorten the duration of this contouring step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.