ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2025
Age does not affect maximal endometrial thickness achieved in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a SARTCORS study.
Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAge is known to affect the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. While significant research efforts have been directed at investigating the effects of aging on oocytes, few studies have examined the effect of aging on the endometrium. We sought to assess whether age negatively impacts peak endometrial thickness achieved in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study utilizing the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System (SART CORS) database between 2016 and 2020. Young (< 35) and older (≥35yo) non-identified oocyte donor (NOD) recipients were included to assess the impact of age on endometrial thickness; young and older gestational carriers (GCs) served as the respective controls for these two groups. The primary outcome was peak endometrial thickness achieved in an FET cycle; additional outcomes included cycle cancellation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate.
resultsWe observed a weak association between age and endometrial thickness in both NOD recipient and GC cycles. Though pregnancy rates were slightly lower at endometrial thicknesses < 8 mm, we observed no difference in clinical pregnancy rate with endometrial thicknesses between 8 and 18 mm. We found a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate in GCs compared to NOD recipients in both the young and older age groups, and noted a decreasing clinical pregnancy rate with age in all groups.
conclusionOur data suggest an age-related decline in pregnancy rates in donor oocyte recipients and gestational carrier cycles, in which an endometrial factor would not necessarily be anticipated; this endometrial factor does not appear to be related to endometrial thickness. Therefore, our data support the existence of an endometrial factor that cannot be assessed by measurements of thickness, but nevertheless plays a crucial role in the success of an embryo implantation. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.