ArticleBMC public health2025
Motivation to practice health-oriented physical activity: a comparative study among university students from three countries with different cultures.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physical Activity Enjoyment and Orthorexic Eating Behaviours in Turkish Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Initiation and sustenance of Chinese Wushu practice: a structural equation model validation of the multi-theory model.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Physical activity barriers, nutrition, motivation, and body composition in university students.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious research has shown the importance of motivation in promoting sustained physical activity, but the impact of cultural and geographical differences on motivational profiles remains underexplored. This study aims to address this gap by comparing motivations for engaging in health-oriented physical activity across three countries on different continents.
methodsFollowing STROBE guidelines, a cross-sectional study was conducted using a stratified sampling method across three countries, yielding 1,252 respondents: 422 from Mexico, 405 from Saudi Arabia, and 425 from Spain. Participants were college students aged 18-25 years. The Motivation Scale Towards Health-Oriented Physical Activity (EMAPS), validated for the Spanish population, was used for data collection. Data integrity was ensured through response verification and addressing flagged entries.
resultsIdentified regulation and intrinsic motivation were the most prevalent types of motivation across all three countries. All countries shared high scores in identified regulation, but cultural differences were evident. Mexico showed higher levels of self-determined regulation, while Spain and Saudi Arabia exhibited more introjected regulation and amotivation, reflecting distinct motivational profiles.
conclusionDespite cultural differences, common motivational patterns for physical activity were identified, emphasizing the universal value of health and well-being goals. Mexico's motivational profile aligns closely with Self-Determination Theory (SDT), highlighting a predominantly self-determined structure with reduced external influence. Conversely, Spain and Saudi Arabia displayed stronger internalization of external pressures. These findings underscore the importance of culturally tailored interventions to promote physical activity, adapting motivational strategies to specific cultural contexts to foster long-term engagement and adherence.
trial registrationThe study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Prince Sultan University (PSU IRB2023110167).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.