Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40753198›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Lesson learned from implementing measures to prevent urinary tract infection and bladder distension in patients with hip fractures - a process evaluation.

Maria Frödin, Brigid M Gillespie, Ewa Wikström, Cecilia Rogmark, Bengt Nellgård, Annette Erichsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria FrödinInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Mölndal, Operation 1, Göteborgsvägen 31, Göteborg, SE-431 80, Sweden. maria.frodin@gu.se.
Brigid M GillespieNMHRC Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Griffith University, Griffith, QLD, Australia.
Ewa WikströmDepartment of Business Administration, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Cecilia RogmarkDepartment of Orthopedics Malmö, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Bengt NellgårdDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Annette ErichsenInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Mölndal, Operation 1, Göteborgsvägen 31, Göteborg, SE-431 80, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCatheter-associated urinary tract infections and bladder distension are common and preventable adverse events. This study presents a process evaluation of a bladder bundle, designed to change healthcare professionals’ way of thinking and acting to prevent these adverse events, using theories of organizational culture, leadership, and an integrated knowledge translation approach.

aimTo enhance understanding of barriers and enablers when implementing recommendations to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections and bladder distension. We examined the implementation concepts of feasibility, acceptability and fidelity, guided by the following research questions: (1) To what extent was the intervention delivered as planned? (2) What factors influenced the implementation process, and how did these factors influence implementation outcomes?

methodsA qualitative and quantitative process evaluation was conducted, guided by the Medical Research Council framework. The intervention was implemented between 2016 and 2020, in a Swedish university hospital, across six units involved in hip fracture care. Data was collected through field notes, implementation logs, emails, presentations, and attendance records. Qualitative data were analyzed using deductive and inductive content analysis. Quantitative data, including attendance and adherence rates, were descriptively summarized under the categories of fidelity, dose, reach, context, and mechanisms of impact.

findingsThe implementation of the intervention was successful regarding feasibility, acceptability and fidelity, which is important for adoption and ownership of interventions. Factors that triggered change were feedback on patient outcomes and ensuring time for learning and re-learning in a safe milieu. Barriers to the intervention were shortages in the workforce, production pressures and lack of experience in collaboration in change projects involving different organizational units. The implementation program enabled ways to work around barriers on macro, meso and micro levels in the organization.

conclusionImplementing practices to prevent both UC-UTIs and bladder distension is feasible but complex and time-intensive. Using theories of organizational culture and leadership, along with a collaborative approach, can support adoption and sustainability of best practices in complex healthcare settings. Findings offer insights for healthcare decision-makers aiming to improve catheter care. TRAIL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry ISRCTN 17,022,695, retrospectively registered on 23 December 2021, after data collection was completed.

Indexed as

Catheter-Related InfectionsHip FracturesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrinary CatheterizationUrinary Tract InfectionsFemaleHumansMaleSwedenBladder distensionHip fractureImplementation interventionIntegrated knowledge translationProcess evaluationUrinary catheter-associated urinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID40753198
PMCPMC12318397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.