Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40753150›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Vestibular function and balance stability in adult cochlear ımplant users: a comparative study of sensory organization, visual acuity, and gaze stabilization.

Isa Tuncay Batuk, Emre Orhan, Merve Ozbal Batuk, Songul Aksoy

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isa Tuncay BatukDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Sıhhıye-Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey. odybatuk@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4900-5649
Emre OrhanDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0734-9614
Merve Ozbal BatukDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Sıhhıye-Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4771-8127
Songul AksoyDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Lokman Hekim University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4584-5528

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the vestibular functions and balance stability in adult cochlear implant (CI) users through a comprehensive set of tests, including the Sensory Organization Test (SOT), Dynamic Visual Acuity (DVA), and Gaze Stabilization Test (GST), in comparison with a control group of age-matched individuals with normal hearing.

methodsTwenty-six adult CI users (11 males, 15 females), aged 18-36 years, were included. Vestibular function and balance were evaluated using computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) to measure sensory organization, dynamic visual acuity, and gaze stabilization. The study group was compared with a control group of 26 age-matched individuals with normal hearing. Correlation analyses were conducted to assess the influence of CI use duration and age on test outcomes. Statistical comparisons between groups were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon test.

resultsCI users performed significantly worse than controls in five of the six SOT conditions (p < 0.05), and the composite scores also showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.000). No statistically significant differences were observed in DVA and GST performance (p < 0.05). Correlation analysis revealed no significant relationship between CI use duration or age and test performance. These results indicate deficits in sensory integration and postural control in CI users.

conclusionThis study provided valuable insight into the vestibular challenges faced by cochlear implant users, revealing significant differences in balance and sensory integration compared to normal-hearing individuals. The findings have significant clinical implications, suggesting the need for individualized vestibular rehabilitation strategies incorporating sensory reweighting exercises, dynamic balance training, and virtual reality-based therapies to enhance post-operative quality of life.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsFixation, OcularPostural BalanceVisual AcuityAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleVestibular Function TestsYoung AdultCochlear implantDynamic visual acuityGaze stabilization testPostural controlSensory organization test

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.