Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40753119›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparison of performance of cervical cancer grading based on acetowhite areas.

Won Jin Yang, So Hyeon Lee, Young Jae Kim, Kwang Gi Kim

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Won Jin YangDepartment of Mathematics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, USA.
So Hyeon LeeDepartment of Biohealth & Medical Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Young Jae KimGachon Biomedical & Convergence Institute, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Kwang Gi KimDepartment of Biohealth & Medical Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea. kimkg@gachon.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer ranks fourth globally in terms of both incidence and mortality among women, making timely diagnosis essential for effective treatment. Although the acetowhite regions and their margins are important for cervical cancer staging, their potential for automated cancer grading remains underexplored. This study aimed to enhance diagnostic accuracy and grading precision by effectively analyzing the acetowhite region and its surroundings. Using four classifiers (Logistic Regression(LR), Random Forest(RF), XGBoost(XGB), and Support Vector Machine(SVM)), 464 cervical images (228 atypical and 236 positive cases) were analyzed. From a set of 75 features, the classifiers identified the top 5 based on feature importance. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis yielded the following precisions for models trained with masks containing only the acetowhite lesion: LR 0.80 (CI 95% 0.70-0.90), SVM 0.83 (CI 95% 0.75-0.92), RF 0.79 (CI 95% 0.69-0.89), XGB 0.66 (CI 95% 0.55-0.77). For models trained with masks including the acetowhite lesion and a 10-pixel margin: LR 0.79 (CI 95% 0.70-0.88), SVM 0.87 (CI 95% 0.78-0.95), RF 0.86 (CI 95% 0.77-0.94), XGB 0.84 (CI 95% 0.75-0.93). Our findings indicate that including a 10-pixel margin around acetowhite lesions improves classifier performance, suggesting its advantage in the automated classification of cervical images.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansNeoplasm GradingROC CurveSupport Vector MachineAcetowhiteCervical cancerClassificationMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40753119
PMCPMC12317971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.