ArticleScientific reports2025
Experimental study on the influence of ground temperature and pore water pressure on the mechanics of excavation unloading sandstone.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As tunnel engineering in western China advances deeper underground, it encounters increasing issues of high ground temperature and high water pressure. To study the mechanical properties of unloading sandstone under the combined effects of temperature and pore water pressure, triaxial unloading and reloading experiments were conducted on sandstone under different temperatures, pore water pressures, and confining pressures. The results showed: (1) The peak strength of unloading sandstone decreases with increasing temperature and pore water pressure. The elastic modulus of unloading sandstone increases with temperature but decreases with increasing pore water pressure. (2) The influence of pore water pressure on the unloading deformation of sandstone has a threshold. At low pore water pressure (1 MPa), temperature has little effect on the deformation of unloading sandstone. At medium to high pore water pressures (2, 3 MPa), temperature-induced unloading softening characteristics are obvious. (3) SEM images show that with increasing temperature, the number and width of microcracks in the rock increase. With increasing pore water pressure, rock cohesion decreases and friction angle increases; under 3 MPa water pore pressure, rock cohesion decreases by 24.8%. (4) The rock's energy storage capacity decreases with increasing temperature and pore water pressure. At high pore water pressure (3 MPa), the effect of temperature on the dissipation energy of sandstone is more significant. In addition, as the temperature rises, the proportion of elastic energy at the rock's peak increases, while the proportion of dissipation energy decreases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.