Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40752972›Full record

ReviewTrends in ecology & evolution2025

Long runs of homozygosity are reliable genomic markers of inbreeding depression.

Christopher C Kyriazis, Jacqueline A Robinson, Kirk E Lohmueller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in ecology & evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genomic diversity and the domestication history of cotton (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher C KyriazisConservation Genetics, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, CA, USA. Electronic address: ckyriazis@sdzwa.org.
Jacqueline A RobinsonInstitute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kirk E LohmuellerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: klohmueller@g.ucla.edu.

Funding

Population genomics of the selective effects of new mutationsR35GM119856 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LOHMUELLER, KIRK · 2016 to 2025
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A long-standing goal in ecological, evolutionary, and conservation genetics is to identify genomic correlates of fitness and inbreeding depression. Over the past several years, a growing body of theoretical and empirical work in diverse mammal and bird taxa has established a strong link between long runs of homozygosity (ROH) and inbreeding depression. Here, we develop a new statistic, ID

Indexed as

BirdsHomozygoteInbreedingInbreeding DepressionMammalsAnimalsGenetic MarkersModels, GeneticGenetic Markersconservationgenetic loadinbreeding depressionpopulation viabilityruns of homozygosity

Identifiers

PMID40752972
PMCPMC13238715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.