ReviewAnesthesiology clinics2025
Current Perspectives on the Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine.
Review in Anesthesiology clinics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Algorithm to Policy: A Bibliometric Analysis of Implementation Science and Governance Frameworks in AI Healthcare Research (2016-2026).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The article explores the transformative impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in critical care medicine. AI models offer superior accuracy in mortality risk assessment and personalized treatment recommendations, enhancing patient outcomes in acute and complex settings. However, various challenges exist, such as data quality, model interpretability, integrating models to clinical workflow, and ethical and legal concerns need to be addressed for successful integration into clinical practice. The article emphasizes the demand for ongoing research on data quality and standardization, building model transparency, developing robust validation methods, and ethical oversight to fully leverage AI's potential in improving critical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.