Trial reportStroke and vascular neurology2026
Treatment of acute intracerebral haemorrhage with a Chinese herbal formula (Shengdi Dahuang Decoction): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in Stroke and vascular neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04200781 (A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Multi-center Clinical Study of Shengdi Dahuang Decoction in the Treatment of Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Multi-center Clinical Study of Shengdi Dahuang Decoction in the Treatment of Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Potential of Traditional Chinese Herbal Medicines in Intracerebral Haemorrhage: A Narrative Review.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importancePer preliminary studies, Shengdi Dahuang Decoction (SDD) is potentially effective for acute intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH); however, its effectiveness has not been rigorously assessed in extensive randomised clinical trials.
objectiveTo evaluate whether SDD can improve 90-day functional outcomes in patients with ICH.
designRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial included patients with acute ICH within 4 hours of symptom onset at five hospitals in Shanghai, China.
interventionsPatients were randomised 1:1 to receive either SDD granules (each sachet contained 15 g of raw MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with a score ranging 0-1 on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) on the 90th day.
resultsOf the total 1211 participants with cerebral haemorrhage assessed for eligibility, 483 were enrolled. Of this, 242 participants were randomly assigned to receive SDD granules and 241 to receive placebo granules (mean age, 62.7 years; 72.9% male). Among these, 112 (46.3%) and 84 (34.9%) patients in the SDD and placebo groups, respectively, had an mRS score of 0-1 on the 90th day (adjusted relative risk 1.20, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.43; p=0.046) . The proportion of patients with poor clinical outcomes (mRS score of 5 or 6 at 90 days) was higher in the placebo group (11.2%) than in the SDD group (5.4%) (p=0.021). The 90-day mortality rate (p=0.299), 7-day National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score (p=0.583), 7-day Glasgow Coma Scale score (p=0.577), 24-hour haematoma enlargement rate (p=0.675) or 7-day relative perihaematomal oedema did not significantly differ (p=0.343) between the groups. The incidence of adverse events between the two groups did not differ significantly (p>0.05).
conclusionsIn patients with acute ICH, incorporating SDD as a supplementary intervention alongside guideline-directed treatments may help enhance 90-day functional outcomes; however, more clinical trials are required to further prove its efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04200781.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.