ArticleJournal of substance use and addiction treatment2025
Interest in contingency management and reducing stimulant use among syringe service program participants.
Article in Journal of substance use and addiction treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A pilot trial of contingency management for stimulant use in a low-barrier syringe service program.Preventive medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionExpanding access to effective treatment for stimulant use disorder (StimUD) is increasingly urgent as US fatal drug poisonings involving stimulants have rapidly increased. Limited information is available regarding interest in StimUD treatment among syringe service program (SSP) participants including interest in contingency management (CM).
methodsWe surveyed SSP participants in Burlington, Vermont regarding their interests in reducing and stopping stimulant use, participating in CM, and examined associations between sociodemographics, drug use, and health/treatment variables with interest in reducing and stopping stimulant use using multivariable logistic regression.
resultsAmong 139 participants, 64.6 % reported interest in reducing and 59.7 % in stopping stimulant use. Overall, 82.8 % of participants reported interest in CM to reduce or stop stimulant use. Interest in reducing use was greater (odds ratio[95 % CI]) among participants currently receiving substance use disorder (SUD) treatment (3.84[1.61-9.14], p < .01), without Hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection (2.61[1.14-5.98], p = .02), and being somewhat (19.29[2.25-165.65], p = .01) or very (19.65[2.34-164.84], p = .01) concerned about anxiety. Interest in stopping use was greater among participants currently receiving SUD treatment (4.98[1.97-12.62], p < .01), without HCV infection (2.87[1.22-6.74], p = .02), participants whose primary drug was opioids compared to both stimulants and opioids (28.13[2.95-267.93], p < .01), and participants whose primary drug was stimulants compared to both stimulants and opioids (12.81[1.45-113.43], p = .02).
conclusionsResults demonstrate interest in stimulant use treatment among this sample of SSP participants, with strong interest in CM. As community-based programs with high social acceptability for their non-judgmental services, SSPs are a novel setting to examine providing evidence-based CM for StimUD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.