ArticleExperimental neurology2025
Hyperreflexia after corticospinal tract lesion reflects 1 A afferent circuit changes not increased KCC2 hyperexcitability.
Article in Experimental neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling cerebral palsy in animals.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2026Review
- KCC2 enhancers normalize reflex responses and improve locomotor function after chronic spinal cord injury.The Journal of physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hyperreflexia is a consequence of spinal cord injury (SCI) and motor system lesions in the brain. Two major mechanisms underpinning hyperreflexia have been reported: proprioceptive afferent (PA) circuit changes produced by 1 A fiber sprouting, which could enhance reflex signaling, together with reduced GABAergic inhibitory presynaptic regulation (GABApre); and increased intrinsic motor neuron excitability, for example, produced by reduced motor neuron membrane-bound potassium-chloride co-transporter2 (KCC2). Here we examine how selective unilateral CST injury in the medullary pyramid (PTX), which eliminates the CST from one hemisphere, allows investigation of different mechanisms to determine their contributions to hyperreflexia. We used rate-dependent depression (RDD) of the Hoffmann (H)-reflex for the forelimb and hindlimb 5th-digit abductor muscles to assess hyperreflexia on both the contra- and ipsilesional sides. We compared RDD longitudinally in intact rats and after unilateral-PTX rats at 7-dpi and 42-dpi, supplemented with additional timepoints to examine hyperreflexia development. Immunohistochemistry was used to identify PA synapses (VGlut1), GABA presynaptic boutons (GABApre), motor neurons (ChAT), and to measure motor neuronal KCC2. Following unilateral PTX, we observed significant hyperreflexia in the contralesional forelimb only. Membrane-bound KCC2 was unchanged in contralesional cervical motor neurons. Whereas both cervical and lumbar motor neurons showed increased PA sprouting contralesionally, there was a concomitant increase in GABApre terminals for the lumbar not cervical cord, which associated with a normal hindlimb H-reflex. Our findings show that KCC2 is disassociated from hyperreflexia in the uniPTX model. Instead, forelimb hyperreflexia can be explained by cervical motor neuron PA sprouting and an uncompensated GABApre regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.