ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2025
Outcomes of Patients With Multiple Myeloma With deletion 1p Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant.
Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeveral studies have suggested that a deletion in the short arm of chromosome 1 (del(1p)) is an independent adverse prognostic factor in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, its impact on outcomes of patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) and receiving contemporary anti-myeloma therapy remains unclear. STUDY
designA retrospective, single-center analysis of newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients with del(1p) who underwent upfront autoHCT between 2010 and 2021. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Propensity-matched comparisons were performed between del(1p) patients and a control group without del(1p) and with standard-risk cytogenetics.
results55 patients were included in our analysis. With a median follow-up of 24.0 months (range 3.8-79.5), the median PFS was 30.2 months (95% CI 18.0-not reached [NR]) and the median OS was not reached (95% CI 41.1-NR). In multivariable analysis, female patients (hazard ratio [95% CI] 2.81 [1.14, 6.91], P = .025) and those with R2-ISS stage IV (compared with stage II 4.85 [1.01, 23.34], P = .049) had worse PFS, whereas patients who achieved CR as the best post-transplant response had better PFS (0.38 [0.16, 0.91], P = .029). Concomitant del(17p) was associated with a significantly worse OS (4.47 [1.18, 17.02], P = .028). Propensity score matching showed no significant differences in PFS (1.63 [0.86, 3.10], P = .13) or OS (1.77 [0.73, 4.32], P = .21) between del(1p) and control patients.
conclusionsIn NDMM patients undergoing upfront autoHCT, del(1p) alone was not significantly associated with inferior outcomes. However, concurrent del(17p) and del(1p) was associated with worse survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.