ReviewThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2025
Maximising opportunity for therapeutic success: sequential participation in cystic fibrosis nucleic acid-based therapy trials.
Review in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nucleic acid-based therapies for people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Advances in cystic fibrosis: CFTR modulator triple combinations.The European respiratory journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying safe and effective therapies that target the underlying cause of cystic fibrosis remains a key priority for the cystic fibrosis community. CFTR modulators are first-in-class, regulatory-approved therapies that improve the function of the protein encoded by the CFTR gene and are associated with dramatic and sustained clinical benefits. Although approximately 90% of the population with cystic fibrosis could benefit from these therapies based on genetic eligibility, a crucial unmet need remains: developing CFTR-directed therapies for the ultra-rare population with cystic fibrosis who are not candidates for CFTR modulators due to either ineligibility or intolerance. Addressing this unmet need will depend on the clinical advancement of nucleic acid-based therapies (NABTs), a term that includes variant-specific antisense oligonucleotide therapies and variant-agnostic mRNA and DNA-based gene therapies. The clinical development of NABTs for those who are not candidates for or unable to take CFTR modulators is challenged not only by the relatively small target population, which affects feasible trial sizes, but also by unique regulatory requirements for long-term safety follow-up and the potential yet unknown short-term and long-term risks with genetic therapy cross-exposure or re-exposure. This Personal View addresses the proactive planning needed to maximise trial opportunities for the population who are not candidates for CFTR modulators, including considerations for subsequent NABT trial participation following previous NABT exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.