ArticleEBioMedicine2025
Artificial intelligence for prediction of atrial fibrillation in the stroke unit: a retrospective derivation validation cohort study.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Prediction and Detection of Atrial Fibrillation from Sinus-Rhythm Electrocardiograms and Ambulatory Monitoring.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Precision cardiovascular medicine with big data and AI.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Quantum Angle-distance kernel for ECG classification and anomaly detection: a quantum-inspired framework for biomedical signal analysis.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Impact of intracardiac echocardiography on radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a clinical study on procedural parameters and post-procedural recurrence.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- LAAEV-centric atrial failure phenotype and a novel integrative score for predicting early recurrence after AF ablation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Adiposity measured by body roundness index is significantly associated with increased stroke prevalence: a population-based cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of interpretable machine learning models for predicting stroke in NVAF patients with CHAFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParoxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of stroke but is often undetected in routine clinical practice. Effective stratification is needed to identify patients with stroke who might benefit the most from intensified AF screening. Several artificial intelligence models have been proposed to predict AF based on ECG in sinus rhythm, but broad implementation has been limited. The most valuable input features and most effective model design for AF prediction are also unclear.
methodsWe developed and tested AF prediction models utilising continuous electrocardiogram monitoring (CEM) recordings from the first 72 h after admission and multiple clinical input features from patients with stroke hospitalised at Charité, Berlin, Germany, between September 2020 and August 2023. We compared different models and input data to identify the best-performing model for prediction of AF. The relative contributions of different input data sources were assessed for explainability. A final model was externally validated using the first hour of monitoring data from the intervention group of the prospective multicentre MonDAFIS study.
findingsThe derivation dataset included 2068 patients with acute ischaemic stroke, of whom 469 (22.7%) had AF, first detected before or during the index hospital stay (366 vs. 103). In predicting newly detected AF, a Bayesian fusion model emerged as best, achieving a ROC-AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.96). Model introspection indicated that HRV was the main driver of the model's predictions. A final, simplified tree-based ensemble model using age and HRV parameters of the first hour of CEM data achieved similar performance (ROC-AUC 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79, 0.95). The final model consistently outperformed the AS5F score in a real-world scenario external validation on the MonDAFIS dataset (1519 patients, thereof 36 (2.37%) with AF; ROC-AUC 0.79 vs. ROC-AUC 0.69, p = 4.69e-03).
interpretationHRV appears to be the most informative variable for predicting AF. A computationally inexpensive model requiring only 1 h of single-lead CEM data and patients' age supports prediction of AF after acute ischaemic stroke for up to seven days. Such a model may enable risk-based stratification for cardiac monitoring, prioritising efforts where most needed to enhance AF screening efficiency and, ultimately, secondary stroke prevention.
fundingThis study was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research and the German Research Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.