ArticleFuture science OA2025
Assessment of the relationship between hematologic parameters, (CPD), in screening for COVID-19 severity in women.
Article in Future science OA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis study evaluated hematological parameters and cell population data (CPDs) to assess their ability to discriminate between moderate and severe COVID-19 in hospitalized female patients, and to identify potential markers associated with worse outcomes. PATIENTS &
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 84 adult female COVID-19 patients hospitalized at CHC-UFPR (Brazil) between March 2020 and July 2021. Patients were stratified into moderate (
resultsSignificant differences (
conclusionsHematological parameters, particularly CPDs and NLR, are valuable for early stratification of COVID-19 severity. These automated, rapid, and cost-effective measures can support clinical decision-making. However, CPD usage depends on analyzer availability and lacks standardization across platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.