ArticleLa Radiologia medica2025
Deep learning-driven incidental detection of vertebral fractures in cancer patients: advancing diagnostic precision and clinical management.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-component imaging and ultrasound-based tools for the assessment of fracture risk.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- Osteoporosis: The Renascent Impact of Vertebral Fractures-A Narrative Review of Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Integrated Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Assessing the clinical reliability of deep learning for vertebral fracture detection: a two-surgeon commentary.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are the most prevalent skeletal manifestations of osteoporosis in cancer patients. Yet, they are frequently missed or not reported in routine clinical radiology, adversely impacting patient outcomes and quality of life. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of a deep-learning (DL)-based application and its potential to reduce the miss rate of incidental VCFs in a high-risk cancer population. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analysed thoraco-abdomino-pelvic (TAP) CT scans from 1556 patients with stage IV cancer collected consecutively over a 4-month period (September-December 2023) in a tertiary cancer center. A DL-based application flagged cases positive for VCFs, which were subsequently reviewed by two expert radiologists for validation. Additionally, grade 3 fractures identified by the application were independently assessed by two expert interventional radiologists to determine their eligibility for vertebroplasty.
resultsOf the 1556 cases, 501 were flagged as positive for VCF by the application, with 436 confirmed as true positives by expert review, yielding a positive predictive value (PPV) of 87%. Common causes of false positives included sclerotic vertebral metastases, scoliosis, and vertebrae misidentification. Notably, 83.5% (364/436) of true positive VCFs were absent from radiology reports, indicating a substantial non-report rate in routine practice. Ten grade 3 fractures were overlooked or not reported by radiologists. Among them, 9 were deemed suitable for vertebroplasty by expert interventional radiologists.
conclusionThis study underscores the potential of DL-based applications to improve the detection of VCFs. The analyzed tool can assist radiologists in detecting more incidental vertebral fractures in adult cancer patients, optimising timely treatment and reducing associated morbidity and economic burden. Moreover, it might enhance patient access to interventional treatments such as vertebroplasty. These findings highlight the transformative role that DL can play in optimising clinical management and outcomes for osteoporosis-related VCFs in cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.