ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025
A multispecies microcosm to assess the effect of footwear wastes on soil biota: a contribution towards sustainability.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the high quantities of solid waste with high concentrations of chromium that the footwear industry produces and its disposal sites, it is vital to understand whether leather residue itself is harmful to the ecosystem. Thus, a microcosm test with multispecies (Brassica oleracea and Eisenia fetida) was carried out using an agricultural soil contaminated with two different leather residues (Wet Blue and Finished Leather) from the footwear industry. After the stabilization period, Brassica oleracea seedlings and Eisenia fetida adults were exposed to these treatments. At the end of the experiment, a series of parameters were analysed in the B. oleracea leaves (leaf chlorophyl content, gas exchange measurements and photosynthetic parameters), in the E. fetida organisms (alkaline comet assay and biomarkers such as acetylcholinesterase and lipid peroxidation) and in the soils (total chromium content, enzymes activity and nitrogen mineralization and potential nitrification). In the case of soil's enzymatic activity, even though some were significantly altered, no negative effects could be attributed to the leather residues. Moreover, the addition of residues to the soil did not significantly affect the plant species; however, the same was not observed for the earthworm E. fetida when in contact with Finished Leather. Overall, Finished Leather residue was the one that caused more effects on the parameters analysed and therefore its disposal should be carefully examined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.