ArticleNeurology and therapy2025
Sequential use of OnabotulinumtoxinA and Erenumab in Chronic Migraine: Retrospective Real-World Report on Bidirectional Switching.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn clinical practice, switching between preventive treatments is common in patients with chronic migraine when efficacy is insufficient or tolerability is poor. With the advent of more targeted therapies, such as onabotulinumtoxinA and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies, treatment options have expanded, yet evidence to guide sequencing decisions remains limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the real-world effectiveness of switching between onabotulinumtoxinA and erenumab and vice versa in patients with chronic migraine who showed inadequate response to their initial preventive treatment.
methodsThis retrospective real-world study included patients with chronic migraine treated at the Headache Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin between October 2022 and December 2024. Eligible patients had received both onabotulinumtoxinA and erenumab in sequence, switching as a result of insufficient efficacy or tolerability. A very good response was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days in the third month after the switch.
resultsOut of 632 screened patients, 78 met the inclusion criteria (84.6% female; mean age 43 ± 14 years). Of these, 54 switched from onabotulinumtoxinA to erenumab, and 24 from erenumab to onabotulinumtoxinA. A very good response was observed in 14 patients (17.9%): 10/54 (18.5%) after switching to erenumab and 4/24 (16.7%) after switching to onabotulinumtoxinA.
conclusionSequential preventive treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA and erenumab resulted in a very good response in about one-fifth of patients. Although both treatments target the CGRP pathway, their distinct mechanisms of action may still provide benefit when switching therapies after initial failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.