ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Enhancing frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomes and treatment personalization through machine learning models.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfertility affects millions globally, with significant social, emotional, and economic consequences. While frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) is a cornerstone of assisted reproductive technology, its clinical pregnancy success rates remain inconsistent (29.6-59.2%). Improving predictive accuracy and personalizing treatment strategies for FET outcomes could address critical unmet needs in reproductive medicine.
objectiveTo develop and validate machine learning models to accurately predict clinical pregnancy outcomes following FET and to simulate personalized treatment strategies based on individual patient profiles.
methodsA retrospective analysis of 1013 FET cycles across two medical centers was conducted. Four machine learning (ML) models-XGBoost, random forest, logistic regression, and deep neural networks-were trained using female-specific features, male-specific features, combined female and male features, and combined features supplemented with expert-selected clinical features. Model performance was evaluated via ROC AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. SHAP analysis identified key predictors, while decision curve analysis assessed clinical utility. Personalized FET strategies were simulated to evaluate the potential for tailored interventions.
resultsThe XGBoost model trained on combined features supplemented with expert-selected clinical features outperformed all other models, achieving the highest ROC AUC (0.7922) along with balanced sensitivity (0.7309) and specificity (0.7755). SHAP analysis highlighted embryo quality, female age, and anti-Müllerian hormone levels as top predictors. Decision curve analysis confirmed XGBoost's clinical utility, demonstrating optimal net benefit across decision thresholds by balancing true and false positives. Simulated personalized strategies based on model predictions showed potential to refine treatment protocols, enhancing pregnancy success rates through patient-specific adjustments.
conclusionsXGBoost-based ML models provide a robust, data-driven framework for predicting FET outcomes and personalizing treatment. By integrating key clinical and embryological factors, these models enable precision care strategies that optimize success rates and patient outcomes. This study underscores the transformative role of ML in advancing reproductive medicine, offering a pathway to improve decision-making and reduce the burden of infertility globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.