ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
An update on paediatric traumatic brain injury in the emergency department: a narrative review.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large Language Model Decision Support for Cranial CT in Pediatric Head Trauma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Epidemiology and centralization of pediatric traumatic brain injury care in Lombardy, Italy: An 11-year regional population-based study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Sibling count and family employment status shape injury patterns and emergency department resource use in pediatric trauma.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects an estimated 330,000 to 500,000 children annually in England and Wales and represents a significant burden on healthcare systems. Presentations range from mild to severe, and each case presents unique challenges to the Emergency Department (ED) clinicians. Most paediatric TBIs are mild, and several validated clinical decision rules (CDRs) such as PECARN help guide CT use. Whilst these rules show good sensitivity, clinician gestalt appears to have better specificity. Not all children with mild TBI require neuroimaging, yet many experience persistent symptoms that require clear discharge advice and follow-up planning. Emerging tools such as fast MRI and blood-based biomarkers may enhance early diagnosis and reduce unnecessary CT use, but these remain investigational. Importantly, mild TBI is increasingly recognised as a condition that may lead to prolonged recovery in a significant proportion of children, highlighting the need for tailored counselling and follow-up. In contrast, the ED approach to moderate and severe TBI prioritises early stabilisation and prevention of secondary injury, though a full review of critical care management is beyond the scope of this paper.This review summarises current evidence relevant to ED-based assessment, imaging decisions, and early management of paediatric TBI, with a focus on mild presentations. We also highlight areas of emerging evidence and identify priority research gaps, including validation of prediction tools in preverbal children, care of neurodivergent populations, and real-world implementation of advanced diagnostics. Finally, we acknowledge the variability in access to imaging and decision-support tools across healthcare settings, and the need for context-specific strategies that support equitable care. What is Known: • Most paediatric TBIs are mild, and clinical decision rules like PECARN support imaging decisions in the ED. • Mild TBI can still result in prolonged symptoms requiring tailored discharge advice and follow-up. What is New: • Emerging tools such as fast MRI and blood-based biomarkers may improve diagnosis but remain investigational. • Priority gaps include care strategies for neurodivergent children and preverbal populations in real-world ED settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.