Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40751746›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

An update on paediatric traumatic brain injury in the emergency department: a narrative review.

Sara Alsuwais, Charlotte Kennedy, Silvia Bressan, Mark Lyttle, Richard Body

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara AlsuwaisDepartment of Emergency Medical Services, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Sara.suwais@gmail.com.
Charlotte KennedyHealth Education North West, Manchester, UK.
Silvia BressanUniversity of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Mark LyttleEmergency Department, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK.
Richard BodyDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects an estimated 330,000 to 500,000 children annually in England and Wales and represents a significant burden on healthcare systems. Presentations range from mild to severe, and each case presents unique challenges to the Emergency Department (ED) clinicians. Most paediatric TBIs are mild, and several validated clinical decision rules (CDRs) such as PECARN help guide CT use. Whilst these rules show good sensitivity, clinician gestalt appears to have better specificity. Not all children with mild TBI require neuroimaging, yet many experience persistent symptoms that require clear discharge advice and follow-up planning. Emerging tools such as fast MRI and blood-based biomarkers may enhance early diagnosis and reduce unnecessary CT use, but these remain investigational. Importantly, mild TBI is increasingly recognised as a condition that may lead to prolonged recovery in a significant proportion of children, highlighting the need for tailored counselling and follow-up. In contrast, the ED approach to moderate and severe TBI prioritises early stabilisation and prevention of secondary injury, though a full review of critical care management is beyond the scope of this paper.This review summarises current evidence relevant to ED-based assessment, imaging decisions, and early management of paediatric TBI, with a focus on mild presentations. We also highlight areas of emerging evidence and identify priority research gaps, including validation of prediction tools in preverbal children, care of neurodivergent populations, and real-world implementation of advanced diagnostics. Finally, we acknowledge the variability in access to imaging and decision-support tools across healthcare settings, and the need for context-specific strategies that support equitable care. What is Known: • Most paediatric TBIs are mild, and clinical decision rules like PECARN support imaging decisions in the ED. • Mild TBI can still result in prolonged symptoms requiring tailored discharge advice and follow-up. What is New: • Emerging tools such as fast MRI and blood-based biomarkers may improve diagnosis but remain investigational. • Priority gaps include care strategies for neurodivergent children and preverbal populations in real-world ED settings.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticEmergency Service, HospitalChildHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedClinical decision rulesEmergency departmentPaediatric traumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID40751746
PMCPMC12317874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.