ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2026
Online Health Literacy Resources for People With Intellectual Disability: A Grey Literature Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating Cancer literacy and help-seeking barriers among individuals with intellectual disabilities in Hungary.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Online Health Literacy Resources for People With Intellectual Disability: A Grey Literature Scoping Review.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople with intellectual disability experience higher rates of physical and mental health problems than those without intellectual disability. Health literacy includes accessing, understanding, appraising and applying health information. Improving health literacy is associated with better health outcomes. The internet is a primary source of health information for many people. This study aimed to evaluate available online health resources for people with intellectual disability and their families to understand information gaps.
methodA scoping review of grey literature was conducted using two searches: a targeted search of disability organisation websites and an advanced Google search using key terms. The methods were guided by a modified version of Arksey and O'Malley's methodological approach.
resultsA total of 1165 health resources for people with intellectual disability and their families were identified. Tests, checks and procedures were the most common category of health addressed (n = 227, 19.5%) and most content was directed at the individual with intellectual disability (n = 837, 71.9%). Resources addressed the health literacy domains of accessing (n = 1165, 100%) and understanding (n = 1132, 97.2%) information more often than appraising (n = 575, 49.5%) and applying (n = 415, 35.6%).
conclusionsImproving the health literacy of people with intellectual disability is an important part of addressing health disparities and requires understanding of the available information. Some information gaps were identified, including limited sexual health resources and mental health resources for adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.