ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Digital-based Living Lab intervention to promote healthy dietary behaviours in adolescents.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying healthy and sustainable high-impact eating behaviour in French children aged 6-15 years: a combined multidisciplinary and living lab participatory approach.Journal of nutritional science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital health interventions are increasingly used to promote behaviour change in adolescents. The Living Lab approach, fostering collaboration with users and stakeholders to identify real-life problems and co-create sustainable solutions, is gaining traction in health interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the usability of a novel Digital-based Living Lab (D-LLab) designed to promote healthy dietary behaviour in adolescents. The D-LLab was developed in four phases: topic derivation, strategy selection, digital tool selection, and usability assessment. It was implemented over a 4-week period, structured into four participatory phases: identifying problems, exploring solutions, solving problems, and sharing outcomes. Twenty-one adolescents aged 14-16 from one middle school enrolled, with a balanced sample of racial and ethnic adolescents, and native Koreans. Usability was evaluated using a mixed methods approach, incorporating quantitative indicators-appropriateness (system usability scale, SUS), acceptability (satisfaction), and feasibility (completion rate)-alongside qualitative data on participant experiences. The mean SUS score was 70.75, exceeding the benchmark for acceptable usability. Participants rated high satisfaction (mean score: 8.45/10), and 95.2% completed all sessions. High usability appeared to be driven by real-time information sharing and collaborative digital interaction, which supported spontaneous problem solving around dietary issues. The D-LLab demonstrated acceptable usability and strong participant engagement. These findings highlight the feasibility of applying digital-based Living Lab approaches in school settings, warranting further trials to evaluate long-term behavioural impact across diverse populations. This intervention was registered at cris.nih.go.kr as KCT0007004.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.