ArticleCancer medicine2025
Implementation of a Patient Navigation Program to Support Representative Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Implementation of a Patient Navigation Program to Support Representative Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAchieving adequate, timely, and diverse trial enrollment remains a major challenge in clinical research. Insufficiently diverse patient representation compromises the generalizability of clinical trial findings and remains a persistent issue in oncology. Navigation services may help patients learn about clinical trials, identify and overcome barriers, and progress through the care pathway to trial enrollment and retention.
methodsWe implemented a patient navigation program to support diverse enrollment and retention of patients in cancer clinical trials; the proximal outcomes were receipt of financial navigation and trial interest. The study was conducted from July 2023 to July 2024 at two demographically diverse health care settings: a university-based tertiary healthcare system and an integrated safety-net healthcare system. Evaluation was guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework and incorporated programmatic data, structured surveys of patients and staff, and qualitative patient interviews.
resultsThe program navigated 429 oncology patients (52% female, 28% Hispanic/Latino (HL), and 16% non-HL Black). Compared to the underlying patient population of the clinical settings, program participants were more likely to be Hispanic (31% vs. 21%; p < 0.01), female (52% vs. 48%; p = 0.01) and from a minority race (30% vs. 24%, p ≤ 0.01). Within the population who were successfully contacted, 325 of 408 (92%) patients already enrolled in a trial received financial navigation to help with trial retention. Among the remaining 83 patients not enrolled in a cancer clinical trial at the time of referral, 39 (47%) expressed interest in participating in a clinical trial in thefuture.
conclusionA patient navigation program to influence enrollment and retention of diverse patients into trials was feasible to implement, highly acceptable to patients, and reached a priority population of patients generally underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. Further research into the effect of navigation on trial enrollment and retention is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.