ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2025
Changes in the Top-Down Control of Planktonic Bacteria in Response to Nutrient Addition and Warming in the Red Sea.
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Top-down structuring of bacterial growth efficiency in a freshwater lake, France.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Changes in the Top-Down Control of Planktonic Bacteria in Response to Nutrient Addition and Warming in the Red Sea.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eutrophication and warming impacts on marine bacterioplankton and their top-down controls (protistan grazers and viruses) are still little known. Here, we evaluated the seasonal variability of the joint impact of nutrient addition and temperature on the abundance of bacterioplankton, heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNFs) and viruses in Red Sea coastal waters. We conducted four microcosm experiments in which samples were either incubated as such (control, C) or amended with phosphate and nitrate (inorganic, I), glucose (organic, O) or both types of nutrients (mixed, M). Each nutrient treatment was incubated at three temperatures spanning 6°C around ambient values (23°C-33°C). Microbial response ratios (RR, the ratio between the maximum abundance in each nutrient amendment treatment relative to the maximum abundance in the C treatment) were variable, with the most noticeable increases found in the I and M treatments, suggesting an effect mediated by increased primary production. Bacterioplankton showed weak responses to warming, but the RRs of HNFs and viruses in the I treatment tended to increase at higher temperatures. The response of HNFs to the increase in prey was stronger than that of viruses. Our results also suggest that the coupling between heterotrophic bacteria and HNFs will likely increase with future warming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.