ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Depression and Anxiety in Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Evaluated by Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES).
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is a swallowing disorder frequently assessed using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), which offers detailed visualization of swallowing function. While the physical consequences of OD, such as aspiration pneumonia and malnutrition, are well known, its psychological impact remains less understood. This study aimed to investigate how sociodemographic and clinical factors relate to OD and to evaluate levels of anxiety and depression in affected individuals. MATERIAL AND METHODS This cross-sectional study included 63 patients who underwent FEES to evaluate swallowing function. Psychological status was assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Based on FEES findings, patients were classified into 2 groups: group 1, impaired swallowing, and group 2, normal swallowing. RESULTS Impaired swallowing was identified in 38% of patients. These patients were significantly older (P=0.041) and predominantly male (P=0.005). BDI scores were significantly higher in the impaired group (P=0.044), indicating a greater prevalence of depressive symptoms. No significant difference was observed in BAI scores (P=0.282). A significantly higher proportion of patients in the normal swallowing group had a prior psychiatric diagnosis (P=0.013) and had received psychiatric treatment (P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates a significant association between OD and depressive symptoms, underscoring the relevance of incorporating psychological assessment into routine clinical evaluation. These findings advocate for a multidisciplinary approach that addresses both the physiological and psychological dimensions of swallowing disorders to enhance patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.