ArticleBMC health services research2025
Evaluation of large-scale implementation of obstetric point of care ultrasound in eight counties in Kenya using RE-AIM framework.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real world evaluation of a distance-supervised ultrasound training programme in a physician-staffed emergency medical service: a prospective, descriptive implementation study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Providers' and pregnant women's perspectives on obstetric point-of-care ultrasound use in peri-urban Karachi, Pakistan: a qualitative study.BMC digital health · 2026Article
- Implementation strategies and economic considerations for point-of-care ultrasound in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundObstetric Point-of-Care Ultrasound (O-POCUS) holds promise for strengthening maternal health services particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, its widespread use is hindered by limited provider training and resource constraints within health facilities. To address this gap, a large-scale O-POCUS program was implemented across eight counties of Kenya whereby 468 healthcare providers (HCPs) from 224 facilities were trained in five basic O-POCUS parameters. This study evaluated the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of this program using the RE-AIM framework.
methodsFor this cross-sectional evaluation study, trained research staff conducted surveys and in-depth interviews with HCPs, stakeholders, and antenatal and postnatal care clients for one week from a random sample of about half of these facilities (n = 114) six months after O-POCUS introduction. A total of 249 HCPs, 2,292 antenatal and 1,704 postnatal clients were surveyed, and 96 HCPs/stakeholders and 114 clients were interviewed. Data were analyzed using descriptive and thematic methods and mapped onto the RE-AIM framework to assess program implementation.
resultsThe findings revealed that O-POCUS was implemented across all 114 health facilities and 1937 (49%) of surveyed clients received a scan (reach). Over 80% of trained HCPs reported moderate to high confidence in performing key obstetric assessments, and 72% reported that O-POCUS influenced clinical decision-making including referrals (effectiveness). 41% of HCPs conducted more than 20 scans per month and 89% of the clients reported that they were likely to recommend O-POCUS to others (adoption). Lack of resources such as gel and paper towels were identified as major challenges (implementation), while 60% of HCPs reported the need for further training and mentorship (maintenance).
conclusionThese findings demonstrate successful large-scale implementation of O-POCUS in Kenya and provide valuable insights for policymakers and healthcare organizations seeking to implement similar O-POCUS programs in resource-limited settings. Continuous strengthening through mentorship, supportive supervision and resource provision is recommended for sustained success of O-POCUS in improving maternal healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.